README_FEM_dispersion When using finite elements to model wave propagation, dispersion is observed when wave velocity is a function of the number of elements contained within the wave length of a propagating wave. Here we study dispersion in unidirectional graphite/epoxy, which is hexagonal and highly anisotropic. Our ultimate objective is to study the effect of anisotropy on the flux deviation (group velocity) propagation direction as a function of different fiber orientations, 0 -> 90 degrees. Based on prior research, transverse (T) and quasi-transverse (QT) wave speeds and propagation direction are observed to be the most sensitive to small changes in anisotropy. In general the actual wave "group" velocity vector, energy flux, deviates from the wave "phase" velocity, which propagates normal to the plane wave front. Between 0 and 90 degrees, group velocity deviates from the phase velocity and the pure transverse (T) wave becomes a quasi-transverse (QT) wave. At 0 and 90 degree fiber orientations the group and phase velocities are the same. This case is used here for simplicity to study dispersion of pure transverse (T) waves before we study dispersion at various fiber orientations. In the accompanying figure, WhatToDo.jpg, six different cases are outlined for a 30x60 FEM mesh. This small mesh size allows us to simulate many different cases of interest in a reasonable time using desktop computers. Increasing the number of elements at the boundary transducer results in an increase in the number of elements contained in the propagating T waves. For 12, 16, 20, and 24 elements per transducer wave length, we observe 3, 4, 5, and 6 elements respectively contained with in the propagating T wave. We also observe increasing wave velocity with increasing number of elements per wave length contained in the propagating T wave. This is expected since larger number of elements contained in a propagating wave approach the ideal case of a wave propagating in a nondispersive continuum. With only 4 elements per transducer wave length the propagating T wave is alter by the FEM mesh, that is the group velocity is zero, which demonstrates significant dispersion. Dispersion exists even at 24 elements per transducer wavelength. However 24 elements per transducer wave length will require larger FEM meshes where QT waves are predicted to deviate as much as 50 degrees to the left. As in most cases when modeling complex phenomena simplifying approximations are necessary and results must be interpreted within these approximations. Here 20 elements per transducer wave length results in a trade-off between working with larger FEM meshes, e.g. 45x180, but with an acceptable degree of dispersion. -- R.D. Kriz